Executive Summary
This quarter, the HR Data Lab focused on Retention Mechanics. We analyzed the lifecycle of our high performers to answer one question: Why do people leave?
The Answer: It is not pay. It is Transitions and Burnout.
graph TD
A[Q1 2026 HR Strategy] --> B{Key Risks}
B --> C(Talent Risk)
B --> D(Operational Risk)
B --> E(Compliance)
C --> C1[Promotion Curse]
C1 --> C2["17% Attrition <br/>(Recently Promoted)"]
style C2 fill:#ffcccc,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
D --> D1[Burnout Risk]
D1 --> D2["39% Attrition <br/>(High Risk Segment)"]
style D2 fill:#ff9999,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
E --> E1[Diversity Health]
E1 --> E2["Pay Gap < 2% <br/>(Target Achieved)"]
style E2 fill:#ccffcc,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
📌 Critical Risks identified
1. The “Promotion Curse” (Talent Risk)
We traditionally view promotions as a retention tool. Our data proves the opposite.
- Finding: High Performers promoted in the last 2 years are 17.0% likely to leave, vs 13.7% for those who are stagnant.
- Rec: Launch “Post-Promotion Onboarding” program immediately.
2. The “Red Zone” (Operational Risk)
We successfully built a predictive model for burnout using existing data fields (Overtime + Commute + Role).
- Finding: 64 Employees are in the “High Risk” category with a 39.1% attrition rate (4x the norm).
- Rec: Immediate workload audit for these 64 individuals.
3. Diversity Health Check (Compliance)
- Status: ✅ Green. Adjusted Pay Gap is negligible (<2%).
- Watchlist: Executive representation (Level 5) remains low at 34%.
For deep dives, please refer to the individual Project Case Studies linked in the Portfolio.